AYP.
Those three letters often create an uncomfortable feeling for those of us who are facing the disappointment of not meeting AYP in our schools. To make a long explanation as short as possible, not meeting AYP requirements means that our school needs to come up with a plan to “prove” that we are currently (and in the future) taking steps to drastically improve our school. I found numerous blogs that discuss NCLB and AYP, but I decided to link to a blogger from BlogCatalog. He entitled one of his posts, “If I Were Secretary of the US Department of Education” and gave some of his insights. It was just interesting to read another person’s point of view and how they would change NCLB or get rid of it altogether. BlogCatalog describes themselves as an “…Open Source Learning Community [is] created by educators for educators. Open Source Learning is the new name for Progressive Education”. It lists a lot of bloggers who share their opinions, and I’m sure that any of us will be able to find another fellow educator that agrees with us (or disagrees with us, which forces us to consider the flip side to all of our opinions). Amyee is another blogger who discusses her opinion on NCLB but also provides links to other helpful resources.
Anyway, as part of the Restructuring Committee, one of the overarching themes that I noticed each subcommittee came up with is this whole idea of “higher expectations”. This includes higher expectations across the board (i.e. staff, administration, students, etc.). As we discussed possible strategies to help students keep up with their work, an administrator brought up Moodle and how his 8th grade daughter was able to access assignments from home when she was absent. I was surprised to see the number of teachers (including my principal) who had no idea what Moodle was, but I also had to remind myself that not all of them have been exposed to online collaboration tools while they were in college or are currently involved in situations that would expose them to these tools like Moodle.
Several teachers (including myself) who have experience with Moodle shared about the program with a lot of enthusiasm and gave a quick overview as to what the program is capable of offering to both teachers and students. Of course, the first question that they asked was, “Well, how much does it cost?” After we explained that it was free, then another concern that was brought up was, “Well, what about the students that don’t have computer access at home?” and then, “Will parents from our low income families buy into this?” Question after question slowly brought down the enthusiasm as more and more problems were brought up rather than how Moodle could offer some possible solutions to the a few of the problems we’ve been facing. Even a fellow teacher who is part of the CTER program had more doubts than hopes for the use of online collaboration tools within our school. I can’t really blame this teacher, though. Our school is not in great shape as a whole, let alone technologically advanced. The percentage of low income students who meet free-reduced lunch requirements have increased dramatically over the past few years. Many families can barely afford to clothe and feed their children, so having a computer and Internet access is not as common as we would expect it to be. Our own school has a very fickle and moody network with computer labs filled with almost an equal amount of computers that don’t work as to the ones that do.
So what do schools like mine do next? Is it worth it to look at different technological tools? Even if we do, how are we supposed to apply them?
I think the first step that many teachers in my building have to realize is that increasing the USE (not just the tools) of technology WILL and CAN play a significant part in improving the overall condition of our school. Part of the higher expectations we need to have as teachers is to see where education is headed and how technology WILL and HAS to play a part in it. Incorporating technology has been and will continue to be an inevitable aspect of education no matter what we may think right now. Like any new program or strategy that is put in place, we need to be open-minded and willing to try, even if we face failures and disappointments.
As I finish this course and head into my last course of CTER next semester, I find myself very thankful for everything I’ve gained from each course I’ve taken. Sure, it will be difficult to apply a lot of the skills and tools I’ve learned, but it doesn’t mean that I won’t ever be able to. Looking back, I see that in many ways, I’ve already applied a lot of things I’ve received from the CTER program (i.e. online collaborative tools, multimedia demonstrations, Internet resources, etc.). In a lot of ways, I know that I’m in better shape than my colleagues, which just pushes me to help them get up to speed as well.
However, in the end, I always have to remind myself that it’s not about me. It’s about my students. If I want them to learn how to have higher expectations for themselves, then I need to continue to have that same attitude for myself as their teacher.
With all that said, I just want to say thanks for a great semester everyone!
I have full confidence that each of us have changed and grown through this program and will continue to develop as educators and workers whever we are/go.